President Donald Trump Thought All Assistance and Welfare Recipients Were Black
Originally appearing on Time Magazine Website
By RYAN SIT
Editors Note: Some grammatical editing and word changes for space adjustment have altered the original report without changing the meaning of the intent of the original writing by Ryan Sit. You may see the initial report by clicking the Time Magazine link above.
In the spring of 2017, the newly elected president met with members of the Congressional Black Caucus. During that meeting, one of the members mentioned to Trump that welfare reform would be detrimental to her constituents— adding, “Not all of whom are black,” according to NBC News.
The president was incredulous. “Really? Then what are they?”
(Statistically speaking, they were probably white.)
In fact, whites are the most significant beneficiaries when it comes to government safety-net programs like the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, commonly referred to as welfare.
White people without a college degree ages 18 to 64 are the most abundant class of adults lifted out of poverty by such programs, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The think tank’s 2017 report stated that 6.2 million working-age whites were lifted above the poverty line in 2014 compared to 2.8 million blacks and 2.4 million Hispanics.
When it comes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP—the initiative formerly known as food stamps—the numbers look similar.
Just over 40 percent of SNAP recipients are white. Another 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian, and 1.2 percent are Native American, according to a 2015 Department of Agriculture report.
Despite Trump’s newly gleaned information, welfare reform remains one of his top goals for 2018. His administration and Congressional Republicans are looking to overhaul federal safety-net programs like SNAP, Medicaid and housing benefits.
News of Trump’s welfare comment arrived as he’s dealing with the backlash of reportedly calling African countries a “shithole” during a bipartisan meeting on immigration Thursday. Trump has denied using such language.
Do You Think Trump Is Subject To Too High Of A Standard?
Be Reminded Of What President Obama Endured!
A Midland Texas Police Officer does what many of those wish to do when receiving annoying, true "FAKE CALLS" from scammers. Abusive phone calls that are invading your privacy, invading peace, invading homes, and invading the feelings of being secure. The video has received over 2 million views on youtube.com, and after waiting for a short commercial intermission from the start, you can hear what was really said!
What Did Ted Kennedy Say About Immigrants In The 1960's?
Providing A Voice For Those Who Might Otherwise Go Unheard Border to Border & Coast to Coast. Sea to Shining Sea
NEWS WHEN YOU WANT IT ~ NEWS WHEN IT HAPPENS
The Hart–Celler Actwas widely supported in Congress. Senator Philip A. Hart introduced the administration-backed immigration bill which was reported to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Immigration and Naturalization Subcommittee. Representative Emanuel Celler introduced the bill in the House of Representatives, which voted 320 to 70 in favor of the act, while the Senate passed the bill by a vote of 76 to 18. In the Senate, 52 Democrats voted yes, 14 no, and 1 abstained. Among Senate Republicans, 24 voted yes, 3 voted no, and 1 abstained. In the House, 202 Democrats voted yes, 60 voted no and 12 abstained, 118 Republicans voted yes, 10 voted no and 11 abstained. In total, 74% of Democrats and 85% of Republicans voted for passage of this bill. Most of the no votes were from the American South, which was then still strongly Democratic.
Republican Talking Points have targeted the late Senator Ted Kennedy with saying that if the Hart-Cellar Act was approved that it would allow those of the countries being allowed special interests, to overrun the United States like animals overtaking a piece of land by overpopulating.
HE DID NOT!
What Was Really Said:
During debate on the Senate floor, Senator Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the act, said;
"our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset".
Michael A. Feighan and other conservative Democrats had insisted that "family unification" should take priority over "employability", on the premise that such a weighting would maintain the existing ethnic profile of the country. That change in policy instead resulted in chain migration dominating the subsequent patterns of immigration to the United States and consequently a more ethnically diverse population.
On October 3, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the legislation into law, saying, "This [old] system violates the basic principle of American democracy, the principle that values and rewards each man on the basis of his merit as a man. It has been un-American in the highest sense because it has been untrue to the faith that brought thousands to these shores even before we were a country".